Talk:The Rolling Stones, Now!

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Rolling Stones, Now!/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Y All the start class criteria Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs Y Categorisation at least by artist and year Cavie78 (talk) 16:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Article requirements: Y Start: reasonably complete infobox; lead section with overview of album; track listing; reference to at least primary personnel by name; Categorization by at least artist and year. C: all of start and (1) cover art in infobox; (2) at least one additional section of prose; (3) track lengths & song authors in tracklist; (4) a personnel section including all musicians. B: all of C and (1) most technical details in infobox; (2) technical personnel in personnel section; (3) no obvious issues with sourcing; (4) no obvious issues with readability, though it may not conform completely to style guidelines; (5) no glaring omissions of information (see some suggestions at WP:ALBUM) or extraneous information, like trivia. Higher Classes are not assigned by WikiProject Album. Please review "the perfect article" and, if already B class, consider seeking additional feedback from Wikipedia:Good articles or Wikipedia:Featured articles. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on article class. To request a reassessment from the Album project, when concerns are addressed, please see "requesting an assessment".

Last edited at 16:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 08:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Rolling Stones, Now!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060327053007/http://bg.mixonline.com/ar/audio_rolling_stones_satisfied/ to http://bg.mixonline.com/ar/audio_rolling_stones_satisfied/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Off The Hook

"Sittin' in my bedroom late last night
Got into bed and turned out the light
Decided to call my baby on the telephone
All I got was a 'Busy' tone..."

How could he dial his girl's number (this was 1964) in the dark? Maybe he just got a wrong number?

"Back into bed, started reading my book..."

Reading? In the dark?

Been worrying about this since 1964, but Mick won't return my calls. 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:69CB:1E2B:3B63:E1B9 (talk) 01:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)