Talk:The Roman Revolution
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
POV
edit"Even so, Syme's account is masterful"
- "Even so" implies that reminding readers of Fascism is a bad thing.
- Masterful is an opinion. Brutannica 08:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
actual event
editShouldnt there be an article on the actual event of the Roman Revolution? Crd721 (talk) 08:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Not exactly. The term "Roman Revolution" was coined by Syme for this work, and in many respects only applies within his text. Whether or not one could fruitfully talk of a factual "Roman Revolution" is highly debatable. There was certainly a transition from Republic to Empire, but Syme chooses this phrase because he wants it to invoke the frequent revolutions (often violent) of the 20th Century, as this comparison suits the purpose of this work. Derekpatterson (talk) 08:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)