Talk:The Salvation Army U.S.A. Central Territory

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 September 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Holiness movement.

Old talk

I just created this page because I noticed on The Salvation Army page there was no page for the Central Territory. I need some help making this page more informative and accurate.

Requested move 22 September 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move after extended time for discussion. bd2412 T 01:34, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Salvation Army U.S.A Central Territory → The Salvation Army U.S.A. Central Territory – To be symmetrical with The Salvation Army U.S.A. Western Territory 205.154.222.17 (talk) 18:28, 22 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:45, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Comment: Is "Salvation Army U.S.A Central Territory" the proper name or a disambiguation of territory? If it's not the proper name, then per MOS:NOTUSA "U.S.A" is not to be used. --Gonnym (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
- Amazing how you nominate and then never return. Comment to admin: no point in relisting this, if even the nom doesn't care about this. Both titles are wrong per NOTUSA, if "U.S.A." is not part of the official name (which it seems it's not). --Gonnym (talk) 20:17, 10 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic