Talk:The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 04:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Copyvio tool reports high copyvio %, however that is only due to quotes, the band name, and song names. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
Let's add some reviews on the vinyl copy as well: http://modern-vinyl.com/2015/01/08/reissue-review-cute-is-what-we-aim-for-the-same-old-blood-rush-with-a-new-touch/ - not doing per comment below | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
AFAIK Modern Vinyl is a self-published source (their podcast is published by Jabber Jaw Media but the website seems to be self-published). Yeepsi (talk) 15:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- I think I addressed all the points before you put the review on hold. Yeepsi (talk) 00:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)