Talk:The Science of Success
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:KochCover.jpg
edit
Image:KochCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Can we remove the tag?
editI have linked this article to:
- Charles G. Koch, the author and CEO of Koch Industries
- David H. Koch, the author's brother and an executive vice president of Koch Industries
- Fred C. Koch, their father whose life is described in the book
- Koch Family, for which the book provides significant historical information —Preceding unsigned comment added by MBMadmirer (talk • contribs) 12:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Criticism
editThe article comes off as one-sided. It is lacking in depth when it comes to explaining the concepts presented in ther book, and does not appear to offer any criticism or contrasting opinions or debate of the concepts and views presented at all. There don't seem to be any critical book reviews, much less anything resembling peer-review or even just a comparison with other ideas of business management. The language is just neutral enough not to come off as overtly promotional or NNPOV, but the article is terribly lacking in that it neither adequately explains the concepts presented, nor does it offer any criticism of them. --172.97.137.237 (talk) 18:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)