Talk:The Second Coming (Heroes)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Second Coming (Heroes) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Second Coming (Heroes). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Second Coming (Heroes) at the Reference desk. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 October 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Image copyright problem with Image:Heroes-Villains.png
edit
The image Image:Heroes-Villains.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --13:24, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
#c-FairuseBot-2008-09-14T13:24:00.000Z-Image_copyright_problem_with_Image:Heroes-Villains.png){kind=link}
Writing Style
editThe writing style for the article appears to be somewhat unencyclopedic, and more journalistic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.246.147 (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
I cleaned up the writing somewhat, trying to keep it all in the same tense, and got rid of all the editorial comments. Realistically, though, someone should probably just fully rewrite the synopsis to not sound so simplistic and juvinile.198.169.127.193 (talk) 14:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.169.127.193 (talk)