Talk:The Secret Doctrine

Albert Einstein bogus claim

An IP is repeatedly making the claim that Albert Einstein had a copy of The Secret Doctrine and it inspired the theory of relativity [1]. This is a bogus claim not supported by any scholars, it was originally taken from Theosophy Wiki [2]. The source is supposed to have been Einstein's niece but he is never confirmed to have had a niece. It is a bogus claim only found in Theosophical literature and does not belong on Wikipedia. We need reliable sources not hearsay. Psychologist Guy (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Not bogus. Is there a source that says he didn't have one? What source do you have claiming that it's made up? 132.205.229.216 (talk) 20:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

The WP:BURDEN is upon he who posits something. Anyway, Einstein was a thorough materialistic rationalist, and had nothing but contempt for occultism. His "cosmic religion" consisted of materialistic rationalism.

Einstein's Weltanschauung was simply not compatible with the theosophical Weltanschauung. More like opposites.

"Physicists Werner Heisenberg and Erwin Schrödinger, two of the main pioneers of quantum mechanics, were interested in Eastern mysticism, but are not known to have directly associated one with the other." From quantum mysticism.

Einstein was the adversary of quantum mysticism, his spirituality could not be conceived bereft of rationalistic philosophy (like that of Spinoza) and mainstream science.

So, if you think of Einstein, think of a hardcore Spinozist materialist, who only retained from mysticism disdain for authority and a sense of wonder which fitted perfectly within his materialist conception of life. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:22, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

The original source for the claim that Einstein had a copy of The Secret Doctrine was Sylvia Cranston's biography of Blavatsky. She wrote "According to his niece, Einstein always had a copy of it on his desk" (HPB: The Extraordinary Life and Influence of Helena Blavatsky, p. 434). Sylvia Cranston was not a historian or scholar, she was a Theosophist and her biography of Blavatsky was far from neutral [3]. As tgeorgescu cites WP:BURDEN, the burden of proof is on the claimant. There are no scholarly references to back up Cranston's claim and no Einstein biographer has supported or verified such a claim. It is likely to be a hoax. Psychologist Guy (talk) 10:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

To be accurate, Einstein retained something about the veil of Maya, but that was seen through his wholly materialistic lens. I think he got that from Schopenhauer. tgeorgescu (talk) 16:45, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

If you don't like the word "materialism", replace it with "scientific naturalism": Einstein was a hardcore scientific naturalist. The claim is thus WP:REDFLAG. tgeorgescu (talk) 20:45, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

"pseudoscientific" again

The use of the term "pseudoscientific" is sourced and has previously been discussed on the talk page at Talk:The_Secret_Doctrine/Archive_1#Criticisms. Meters (talk) 00:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Yup, seen the recent revert, I have to chime in: the book is not condemned for making strictly metaphysical claims (such as their own brand of Platonic realism), but for making an awful lot of falsifiable claims. Such claims not only are pseudoscience now, but they also were pseudoscience at the moment the book got published. Scientists and scholars derided the book since it was published, and the take of mainstream scientists has not changed since then. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)