This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels articles
Hi. Klbrain, thanks for making the connection. This doesn't require a lot of discussion. The two articles were created by the same author many years apart, by coincidence, using two different valid names for the place. They should obviously be merged, I will proceed to do that. Thanks! --Doncram (talk) 21:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
And now it has been merged, I think all is okay now. Klbrain, could you possibly please check the merge and make any further edits. And also, is there anything to be done to finish closing the merge? In my edits I have removed the merger proposal tags on both articles that were placed (apparently imperfectly somehow back in February) and were fixed by you. Thank you for your attention here. The combined article is better than either one was. --Doncram (talk) 22:15, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
That's fine; I was being somewhat formal by adding the other merge template, but don't mind the merge being done boldly without a further delay. I've reversed the talk page redirect (that isn't usually done; keeping that separate is helpful if people want to discuss re-creating pages, or to track history) and added 'merged from' and 'merged to' templates on the respective talk pages. I think that that does it. Klbrain (talk) 23:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
.png){kind=small}
