Talk:The Sisters Grimm

Please refrain from chatting here. This page is for discussing issues concerning the Sisters Grimm article only. Thank you. 74.221.36.132 (talk) 03:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)EpicSitcom74.221.36.132 (talk) 03:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC) 12/30/09

ex-mayor: Prince Charming

Shouldn't Prince Charming just be put as "Prince Charming!? After all, he still is mayor in the first and second books as well as most of the third. Besides,it kinda ruins it for first time Sister Grimm readers. They don't know that Prince Charming is replaced by... i'll just type it. Queen of Hearts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.166.83 (talk) 23:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

The Books Without Articles

I have noticed that many of the books in the series do not have their own articles. I am asking for this to be changed. I do not have an account, so I may not create one. Please consider this. 74.96.4.195 (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Anonymous Reader.

Can you find an established precedent for equivalence book series having separate articles per book? Does that meet the relevance standards? If so, I could help with this process. Trogdor314 (talk) 08:10, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Elvis

Its probably silly of me, but I don't think Elvis should be listed as a minor character. He is VERY important!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.228.238.254 (talk) 03:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

uncle jake/jacob grimm

I think that it is totally wrong that uncle jake/jacob grimm isn't mentioned as one of the characters!!!! P.S. I am also in favor of listing Elvis as a mojor character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.245.80.75 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 15 April 2011‎

Spoilers

Is it just me, or do other people think this page contains SPOILERS? I mean, I've read them all, but if I hadn't, I would be very disspointed to know some of these things. 98.226.198.164 (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Liberty

Charming

Uh... HELLO?! Charming isn't a minor character!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.226.198.164 (talk) 01:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

RED RIDING HOOD, MINOR CHARACTER?

SHE ON THE FRONT COVER OF THE THRID BOOK FOR PETE'S SAKE? SHE'S PART OF THE GRIM FAMILY, SHE HAD POSSESSION OVER THERE PARENTS FOR A WHILE, AND THERE LITTLE BROTHER, SHE IS KINDA RESPONSIBLE FOR LIKE 1/8 OF THE THINGS THAT HAPPEN IN THE SERIES, SHE HAS A SERIOUS CONNECTION/FRIENDSHIP WITH MR.CANIS AND INHERITS THE WOLF'S POWER. AND UNLIKE CANIS CAN ACTUALLY CONTROL IT, REALLY? RED RIDING HOOD IS A MINOR CHARACTER? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.65.135 (talk) 17:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Sisters Grimm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120164719/http://www.kirkusreviews.com/kirkusreviews/images/pdf/kr_childrens_best_1205.pdf to http://www.kirkusreviews.com/kirkusreviews/images/pdf/kr_childrens_best_1205.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)