Talk:The Snow Queen 2
(Redirected from Talk:The Snow Queen 2: The Snow King)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Guanaco in topic Requested move 10 June 2017
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 10 June 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved (non-admin closure) —Guanaco 06:11, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
The Snow Queen 2: The Snow King → The Snow Queen 2 – this is the only title shown on the poster. No source was given to support "The Snow King" as a subtitle. Even if there was, given the alternate " magic of the ice mirror" subtitle it would be simpler to use just the main title. ScratchMarshall (talk) 01:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support move to... something else. "Variety" actually called this The Snow Queen: Journey Continues. "The Guardian" calls it The Snow Queen: Magic of the Ice Mirror. I don't see any source calling to The Snow Queen 2: The Snow King... in fact, I don't see any of the sources calling it The Snow Queen 2 at all!! But definitely, no one seems to call it The Snow Queen 2: The Snow King... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:08, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- OK, Amazon is the one that calls it The Snow Queen 2: The Snow King [1] – this is despite the fact that this is not what is shown in the DVD cover art at this very same Amazon page... Nonetheless, The Snow Queen 2: The Snow King is definitely not the WP:COMMONNAME, so the article should be moved to some other title. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:28, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: I just watched the official English trailer, and it says The Snow Queen 2 with no subtitle. Is it alright with you if I close this and make the move? —Guanaco 06:08, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Guanaco: Yep, fine with me. Honestly, it looks like the best of the available choices... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 06:09, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.