Talk:The Society of the Spectacle/Archives/2015
 | This is an archive of past discussions about The Society of the Spectacle. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Question
I have a question: should some of the sections that address the Spectacle in the article dealing with the situationists not in fact be here? I'm interested in the pages for the The concentrated spectacle, The diffuse spectacle, and The integrated spectacle. However, since these ideas are used by people who may not agree with all of Debord's ideas (and his penchant for controversy), I'm not sure how to proceed. This article needs work. I would be interested in hearing an opinion about this. Cyclopean typewriter 19:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
the amount of citations for one sentance 174.6.181.68 (talk) 01:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC) LOL...
This whole page is a poor summary of the book, if someone knowledgeable could improve it and translate it into ordinary language instead of Debord's strange prose, that would be helpfull. ```