Talk:The South's Finest
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Hog Farm in topic "Philip Thomas Tucker" listed at Redirects for discussion
 | A fact from The South's Finest appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 November 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publishing company notability
editIn order for a publishing company to be notable, it would usually have to meet WP:NCORP: it's not usually enough to publish notable books, as book reviews rarely discuss the publisher in any depth. I see no evidence that White Mane meets this criteria, and if it's not notable, it shouldn't be redlinked. (t · c) buidhe 03:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Buidhe - Redlinks removed, I just kinda linked them assuming White Mane was notable, which after a look, doesn't seem to be true. Tucker's put out a decent amount of work, some of which is fairly widely cited, so he might make a run at WP:NAUTHOR, so I'll leave his redlinks in. I'm new at writing book articles, so these aren't gonna be anywhere near perfect. Hog Farm Bacon 03:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that one reviewer of the book The South's Finest called it "chronically and annoyingly" melodramatic? Piston 1994 in the text
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Max Näther
- Comment: Can come up with another one upon demand. There's not a whole lot to work with here
Created by Hog Farm (talk). Self-nominated at 04:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
epicgenius (talk) 20:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)"Philip Thomas Tucker" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Philip Thomas Tucker. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 21#Philip Thomas Tucker until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 06:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)