Talk:The Stanford Review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Stanford Review article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-09-30. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization: |
AfD news story
editThis article was AfD'd but there is not AfD tag here. In any case, the AfD was discussed at The Stanford Review.
- Ryan Tracey (Editor-in-Chief), "Editor's Note: Wikipedia Wars", The Stanford Review, Volume XXXVII, Issue 3, October 13, 2006. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stbalbach (talk • contribs)
- This article was included in a batch of articles nominated for deletion, see walled garden. I found the AfD discussion here. Likely, half of the other articles in the batch are missing AfD tags too. Maybe I'll mosey over in their direction.... Xaxafrad 23:27, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Stanford Review. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050408015220/http://www.worldaheadpublishing.com/authors/index.php to http://www.worldaheadpublishing.com/authors/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Relevance?
edit"By 1987, Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition inspired a coalition of Stanford students that put forth a set of demands called the Rainbow Agenda.[2] The Stanford Review was founded partly to provide an alternative viewpoint.[3]"
I couldn't understand what the Review had to do with Jesse Jackson. I thought "an alternative viewpoint" was meant in the most general sense. Now I think that it meant an alternative to the Rainbow Agenda. Maybe that could be made more explicit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:9046:800:5C08:2872:D715:47C7 (talk) 05:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Fred Savage
editI cold find no evidence that Fred Savage was a staffer for the Review. Could someone link to a story he write, or even to a secondary source mentioning he was a writer? 152.17.57.133 (talk) 22:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- sorry typo: could find no evidence 152.17.57.133 (talk) 22:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)