Talk:The State of the Art

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Publication Date ?

Dates

edit

Hi there. Just to clear up why I deleted the date linking (now restored). Basically, it seems silly to link dates that have little bearing on the article at hand (context is everything). The case in point was linking dates that referred to broadcast dates of stories. This seemed silly to me because, first of all, other dates, such as the publication date (which seems more relevant to the article) aren't linked. I don't support the linking of them either as, more importantly, it's not obvious why a browsing reader would move from a book to the article on the year that book was published. Regarding WP style, this point is still debated. The style manual says very little about when dates should and shouldn't be linked (the most relevant page is this one), and there's division on best practice. Anyway, that's my POV, but I thought I'd explain it. Cheers, --Plumbago 22:04, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Makes sense, and normally I would heartily agree that unnecessary links should be avoided. I think though that it is entirely uncontroversial that full dates like 15 July 2006 should be linked so that users' date preferences will work. --Guinnog 22:11, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
The page is quite confusing right now: the article refers to the collection of short stories, first published in 1991, but the information on the right refers to the single short story of the same name, and gives 1989 as the publication date (indeed the date the short story was first published). Eldacan 17:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eldacan (talkcontribs)
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The State of the Art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Reply