![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Untitled
editIsn't just like the Wikipedia to carry such awful, pedestrian disinformation about a topic?
I mean come on, the Stones of Venice is a classic work and all this dirtbag of data has is a stupid Dr. Who episode.
- You know, you could have simply pointed it out on the talk page and someone would have done what I've just done - created separate pages for the book and the audio. Please be civil. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 12:23, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
- The parity expressed here, that the reader might just as easily be looking for a Doctor Who audio instead of The Stones of Venice itself, is a very specific age and class POV, which though shared by many Wikipedians, just is not mainstream. --Wetman (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)