Talk:The Structure of Literature

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Czar in topic GA Review
Featured articleThe Structure of Literature is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 7, 2024.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 24, 2023Good article nomineeListed
February 28, 2024Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Cover

edit

Note to self: Replace current cover with the black hardcover (1954). I think the current version is the paperback cover. czar 01:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Structure of Literature/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed
  • Literary criticism truly sounds like the type of topic that is the life of a party.
  • "The published version of his doctoral dissertation in the humanities, Goodman" Implies that Goodman is the published dissertation.
  • "made in a 1934 article on aesthetics by the author" maybe better as "made by the author in a 1934 article on aesthetics"
  • "Goodman's mentor" Mentors, since there's two of them?
  • "known as the "Chicago School" and affiliated with Richard McKeon and R. S. Crane" The second part of that clause seems grammatically incorrect.
  • Langrum, Robert (June 14, 1954). "No Final Vision". The New Republic. Vol. 130. pp. 25–26. Is not cited.
  • James, Mertice M.; Brown, Dorothy, eds. (1955). Goodman, Paul. Structure of literature. p. 365. Has a formatting error.
  • Spot-checks:
    • Rodway, A. E. (1955). "A Critical Technocrat". Essays in Criticism. 5 (1): 55–63. Verifies all claims made.
  • That's all I have. AryKun (talk) 15:41, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review! I kept "article on aesthetics by the author" so that the following "who" clause refers to Goodman and not aesthetics. "Goodman's mentor" refers to just McKeon, hence that order. And I've edited the rest. Thanks again. czar 12:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply