Talk:The Tablet
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Tablet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of The Tablet be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in London may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
John Wilkins
editYour link to John Wilkins is not accurate as it links to the 17th century founder of the Royal Society and not to the recently retired editor of the English Tablet journal!
Readership citation
editApparently, some sort of freeze has been put on editing this article due to recent vandalism. I do have a reference for the readership statistics, but I can't edit the article at this point. The Tablet's weekly readership is 23,500, and its estimated readership is 65,000. My source is this article: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/catholic-weekly-the-tablet-relaunches-470583.html
If somebody has the authority to sidestep the editing freeze and give the readership numbers a citation, that would be great! KelseighB (talk) 03:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
The Bitter Pill
editThis nickname is out of place in the lead. Bear in mind that however wrong-headed it may have become, the Tablet goes back to 1840 and has a long and to some extent honourable history. The wikipedia article is no place for registering your disgust with its current editorial stances. --Paularblaster (talk) 09:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on The Tablet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060409080542/http://news.independent.co.uk:80/media/article352295.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/media/article352295.ece
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)