Talk:The Trees Community
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed deletion
editContested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted.
Why? Aside from being a stunning band with a strong cult following, they're mentioned by Allmusic, Amazon.com, Stylus Magazine, Pitchfork Media... the list goes one. While I cannot seem to locate the exact guidelines for what warrants musical "significance", surely Googling the band's name should give you all that is needed? --Powelldinho (talk) 16:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- I would strongly urge you to add that information (with citations!) to the article before some other admin deletes this. That stuff establishing the significance of the subject must be in the article before it can establish notability, not on the talk page!⟳ausa کui × 00:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Additional Research
editAdded 2 photos of the band. Also linked from our "Art in America (band) Wikipedia page, since the a founding mbr of this musical group, was also a founding of our group "Art in America". Both culturally significant. Crootnik talk 15:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
added some much needed citations and References section, will continue to add more. Crootnik talk 22:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)