Talk:The Valley Library/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: RHM22 (talk) 16:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

No DAB links, external links look fine.

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

I would like to review your article. I learned quite a bit from reading it.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article is short, but it seems to cover the topic thoroughly.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The facts seem to check out.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The article seems thorough to me.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   No bias.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article is stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The images all seem to be tagged correctly.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Nice work!-RHM22 (talk) 16:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.