Talk:The Vampire Diaries season 1

Formatting

Why are the episodes first part and the starring section removed? And for the storylines section, it should include just the basics and some character development. Jayy008 (talk) 20:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Please read the above and you'll have my answers. And about the starring section. ChaosMaster16 removed it, and I agree with him because if we have cast/casting section, it will be enough to cover that topic.---Max^(talk) 21:00, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Actually, there is a discussion on updating the MOS of the episode lists here. Feel free to contribute also. ChaosMaster_Chat 22:52, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Let's Begin

  We can discuss here! Please let's do some work. :) I want to let you know that I found some interesting material. For example, since the show began I searched anything relating to what L.J. Smith had spoken about regarding the show. I was looking for her approval when I found something we can use in the main article. Now let's talk about the article itself.
  
  I see the article sectioned off this way:

Introduction, Episodes, Production, Casting/ Cast & Characters, Reception section divided on ratings and critical reception, Home Releases/ DVD Releases, References and Eexternal links section.

  Knowing myself, I would enjoy a lot of writing within the storylines section but I think that the episodes are covering that. If you find some interesting cast comments about the storylines or Kevin Williamson and Julie Plec’s interviews regarding their decisions about the story arcs then we can add them to the section. 

Disclaimers:
  I just want to say that we must have discussions here before none makes any changes to make sure it’s correct and everyone agrees. So let's discuss first and then make the changes.

  Also, Jayy008 and myself will be searching articles and trying to write them in the best possible way we can. We would also like for ChaosMaster16 to supervise us and check for typos but please don't just erase stuff you think are unnecessary without bringing it up to anyone who has put effort into these articles.---Max(talk) 20:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Actually, if you want to add the references here, we can work on editing both articles. I would think it needs to be evenly split, and we should try to avoid saying the same thing on both articles. Obviously there are exceptions (22 episodes, the dates, ratings, ex.) but complete sections or sentences should be avoided. More sources and information for protduction, casting, writing, and reception would be good also. ChaosMaster_Chat 22:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

   I'll put the stuff I’ve found here (because this is our only sandbox) and then if you think that some of the stuff should be in the main article put them there and remove them from here. I think that in this section we should pay attention on the supporting cast, because this article is about the first season and the main article will have information about the main cast. I think you were thinking about this when you said we shouldn't repeat ourselves. Right? :) ---Max(talk) 11:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Vampire Diaries (season 1). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090522112540/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/television/news/e3ic8543054a8a9084de067a8e4d399b1d7 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3ic8543054a8a9084de067a8e4d399b1d7

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)