Talk:The Video Collection 93:99/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

More great work from you, Legolas. Just a few comments (not GA stuff though):

• I gave the 'Formats' section a quick copy-edit. Please make sure that you're happy with it.
• 'Warner Music Vision' in the lead could be wikified; why is it mentioned as this in the lead and as 'Warner Bros. Records' later on?
• Could some screenshot(s) of music videos be placed alongside critical comments to further describe her images referred to?
• For consistency, chart positions (especially under 100) are usually spelt out.