Talk:The Walt Disney Company/Archive/2013
 | This is an archive of past discussions about The Walt Disney Company. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Little Mistake ?
They're a problem in the listing of firm :
it said 5 mains companys, but after it name only 4. Is it normal ?
Flo (02/27/2013) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.221.25.166 (talk) 17:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Additions
I will be talking about the criticism that Disney has inquired in different countries because of the different rules and regulations they have to follow. Like in china they only control 40 percent of there own company because the country owns the rest. Also the criticism that Disney has gotten involving alcohol in there parks across the world and not in the United states.Jmathews63 (talk) 18:56, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Disney has always encountered different situations criticism but the reason they have to have wine and alcohol in France and or in other country's is because that is all they drink with there meals and or at all through out the day.Jmathews63 (talk) 18:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Disney Enterprises
There is discussion regarding Disney Enterprises and W Disney Studios at here that RicJac though was germane to this article. Spshu (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Dogma?
In the controversies section, it mentions various christian groups opposed Dogma. While this is true, it has no connection to Disney whatsoever. View Askew and Lionsgate are wholely separate from Disney Corporation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.68.46.92 (talk) 12:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Are Disney send out the wrong message for some of the story? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mediapop (talk • contribs) 08:42, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Miramax (then owned by Disney) was supposed to distribute Dogma, but dropped it after rpessure from religious groups. --FuriousFreddy (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
The end of "princess era"?
In the subheading "2005–present: The Iger era", it is stated that:
"[Ed Catmull] explained that they were looking to get away from the princess era due to the changes in audience composition and preference."
I'm afraid this citation is obsolete as the source was retrieved in 2010. In the source article it is also stated that Lasseter had abandoned "The Snow Queen" project, however "Frozen" is now playing in cinemas.
So I would recommend this line to be removed.Quenhitran (talk) 16:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)