Talk:The Wolf of Wall Street (2013 film)/GA1
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kncny11 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kncny11 (talk · contribs) 20:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I promise this one will take less time to comb through than The Hunger Games! You know the drill, Working means I haven't finished it, but feel free to start making changes as soon as you see them appear.
Infobox and lede
edit- The statement that this is Scorcese's fifth collaboration with DiCaprio and second with Winter is not mentioned in the body
- Done removed Chompy Ace 12:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- "with praise for Scorsese's direction, the comedic performances of DiCaprio and Hill, the screenplay, and the fast-paced and consistent humor" also not mentioned in the body
- Done removed Chompy Ace 12:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Plot
edit- Good length (686 words)
- WL Wall Street and stockbroker
- "sex and drug-fueled" → "sex– and drug–fueled"
- ""hard sell."" → ""hard sell"." per MOS:LQ
- "worth a lot less" → "worth much less"
- Comma after "for his testimony"
Cast
edit- No need to include citations for anything except the uncredited cameo
Development
edit- ", Jordan Belfort made $1 million on the movie rights." → "with Belfort making $1 million off the deal."
- Neither [15] nor [16] reference the Brad Pitt bidding war
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- [16] doesn't mention anything in the sentence to which it's tied
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Martin Scorsese was considered to direct the film,[17][18] during pre-production, Scorsese worked on the film's script before working on Shutter Island. This sentence needs to be rewritten for clarity, as I'm not sure I'm following at the moment.
- [16] and [19] are the same reference under different numbers
- "had offered Ridley Scott to direct the film" → "had offered the directorial role to Ridley Scott"
- Comma after "independent company Red Granite Pictures"
- Comma after "came back on board"
- Not immediately clear from the first three paragraphs that Scorcese outright abandoned directing the project for a while
- "and the film is even tamer in its depiction" needs a citation.
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Last sentence of the paragraph is a run-on that needs some rewriting for tone
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Filming
edit- "Hill announced on Twitter that his first day"
- MovieLoci.com doesn't seem like a very reliable source (it looks user-generated to me)
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Additionally, citations are needed for Harrison and Ardsley mentions
- WL Vitamin D
- More context for Schoonmaker saying that the film would be shot digitally
- Comma after "proponent of shooting on film"
- End sentence after "photographed in 3D"
- "however, The Wolf of Wall Street was originally planned to be shot digitally despite being filmed in 2D." → "Despite being filmed in 2D, The Wolf of Wall Street was originally planned to be shot digitally."
- Comma after "shot on film stock"
- "the digital Arri Alexa camera system."
Use of animals
edit- "the film's trading company" → "the trading company depicted in the film"
- "for its symbol" → "as its symbol"
- The last sentence seems slightly out of place, and I'm wondering if this and the controversy on the use of animals should be put together in one section
Profanity
edit- Guinness World Record needs a citation in the body
- The junkiemonkeys link [53] is broken.
- Swearnet: The Movie needs a citation
Release
edit- "It was previously slated to be released on November 15, 2013, but the date was pushed back after film cuts were made to reduce the run time." → "The film's original release date of November 15 was pushed back after cuts were made to reduce the run time."
- "set for a Christmas 2013 release." → "set for release that Christmas."
- "Paramount officially confirmed the Christmas Day 2013 release date on October 29, 2013, with a running time of 165 minutes." → "On October 29, Paramount officially confirmed that the film would release on Christmas Day, with a running time of 165 minutes."
- "On November 25, 2013, the length was announced to be 179 minutes." → "This run time was changed to 179 minutes on November 25."
- "rated R by the Motion Picture Association"
- "The film marks a change in film history" → "The release of The Wolf of Wall Street marks a shift in cinema history"
- Link 35mm film in the first sentence, not the second
Box office & critical response
edit- The Rolling Stone sentence needs a citation
- "wrote that the film did not work for her," → "was more critical"
- "as an irresponsible glorification of Belfort and his associates"
- "2nd best" → "second best"
Audience response
edit- "a rating lower than anything else in theaters the opening week of the film." → "the lowest rating of any film opening that week."
- Per MOS:DASH, either remove the spaces around the em dashes in the third paragraph, or replace them with en dashes
- Already done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- You only need [92] at the end of the third paragraph
- ""beyond an insult" to his victims" → ""beyond an insult to Belfort's victims" (clarifies the "he")
Controversies
edit- Italicize Variety and link to Variety (magazine)
- Comma after "Hollywood's use of animals"
- Comma after "by producer Riza Aziz"
- "illicit monetary movements and in 2016 was" → "illicit monetary movements, and, in 2016, was"
- expand DOJ into "Department of Justice"
- A bit of a WP:REFBOMB after the DOJ quote. [94] is pretty much reporting on [96], so the former can be removed
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- "At the ending of the film, Malaysian fugitive financier Jho Low was credited," → "Fugitive Malaysian financier Jho Low was credited at the end of the film"
- "created more speculation" with regards to what, exactly?
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- move [100] to the end of the sentence.
- The paragraph beginning "In January 2020" set off an Earwig red flag, even outside of the direct quote, and needs to be rewritten for close paraphrasing.
- ""and psychopathic behavior."" → ""and psychopathic behavior"." per MOS:LQ
- "short lived" → "short-lived"
- ""fraud is left unchecked."" → ""fraud is left unchecked"." per MOS:LQ
- In an interview, Josh Greenstein, Chief Marketing Officer of Paramount Pictures during the film's release, he depicts how needs to be rewritten for clarity
- ""about the world."" → ""about the world"." per MOS:LQ
- Last two sentences need a citation.
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Jordan Belfort's reception
edit- I think London Real should be italicized? It's a podcast and YT channel
- "increasingly senseless and greedy crimes" needs a tweak for neutrality, or a direct quote from Belfort
Accolades
edit- The Oscar and BAFTA nominations require citations
Soundtrack
editReferences
edit- We Got This Covered is grossly unreliable (my friends in the comics industry hate it for all the unsubstantiated clickbaity rumors it peddles)
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- [6] is missing the first letter ("he" instead of "The")
- [11] is a bare reference to an unreliable source (IMDb)
- Done per WP:IMDB Chompy Ace 13:03, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- [14] is also missing the first letter ("ow" instead of "How")
- [16] and [19] are the same source
- Change instances of "Deadline.com" to "Deadline Hollywood"
- [26] and [27] are incomplete refs
- In general, any publication that's currently .com should be altered to the publication name (ew.com → Entertainment Weekly, HollywoodReporter.com → The Hollywood Reporter, etc.)
- [60] is missing a publication
- [63] is a bare link
- [66] is missing a work/publication
- [102] and [103] are also bare links
General comments
edit- Article is stable
- Pictures are good
- Earwig score is high but clearly a mirror. The one paragraph of concern is listed above
Final comments and verdict
editPutting On hold until all issues are fixed. Don't be afraid to reach out if you have any questions. Kncny11 (shoot) 00:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Kncny11: All of your suggestions and comments have been addressed (proof). Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for making those changes, Some Dude From North Carolina (and Chompy Ace, your contributions are not unnoticed!) Passing now. :) Kncny11 (shoot) 19:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)