Talk:The Working Hour
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editI am improving the reference quality and adding sources/instances to verify notability.CptMcKrowsky (talk) 19:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Questionable notability.
editThe original request for speedy deletion for this article was probably a good one, but the article's creator has subsequently added enough material so that it now makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7 of criteria for speedy deletion. I am not, however, convinced that the article is notable under WP:Notability (music). I have no strong opinion on the subject at this time, but the issue can be raised at the WP:Articles for deletion page if necessary. I would encourage the author to add material that would evidence notability. In particular, the article needs some third party reliable sources. If there are none, then the band is probably non-notable. All it should take, basically, is a review or significant discussion of the band in a newspaper, or something like that. COGDEN 20:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
--Edited page to show "review or significant discussion of the band in a newspaper, or something like that." CptMcKrowsky (talk) 20:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Looks good. I think the band's sufficient notability is clear, based on what's now in the article. COGDEN 04:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Working Hour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061107185359/http://www.itunes.com/ to http://www.itunes.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)