This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Why does this book have its own article? I don't see it being significantly superior to the other Peet works. Brutannica 01:31, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- perhaps your question should be rephrased as: why don't the other books have their own articles? Or even ask yourself: why haven't I written articles for the other Bill Peet works? brain 02:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- What brain said, plus it's one of his more popular books, though I can't find the link at the moment I know that information exists. I shall find it soon. 24.177.120.179 (talk) 08:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)