Talk:The Young Muslims UK

Deletion Unnecessary

This is an established organisation that has been running for over 20 years. There have been notable members of the organisation such as Inayat Bunglawala active in mainstream British media. There is no reason for deletion, rather improvement. usayd (talk) 20:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Please take a look at: WP:N, WP:Notability (organizations and companies), WP:RS and WP:V for guidelines on notability and sources. If the subject of the article is not notable or claims of notability cannot be verified by reliable sources, the article will be deleted. Thank you. – ukexpat (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Do you have references, which would show the notability of the article, I could only find an article in the UK Independent? It is me i think (talk) 12:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Additional info on Young Muslims UK

Book by former member http://www.democratiya.com/review.asp?reviews_id=112 "The Islamist: Why I joined radical islam in Britain, what I saw inside and why I left" by Ed Husain Penguin, 2007, 288. pp.

New story: The attacks on London, Part Three: Conflict within Islam —Preceding unsigned comment added by It is me i think (talk • contribs) 21:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Two points, firstly please refer to Jihad article to understand what exactly Jihad is. YMUK does not advocate Jihad and you must refer to the current website. Secondly there is a difference between YMO and YMUK they are two different organisations. The references to YMO in Ed Hussains book are not references to YMUK. usayd (talk) 10:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

thanks for the point that YMO and YMUK are different organizations. Do you have a credible source that would contradict the UK Independent article which says YMUK does not advocate Jihad? thanks It is me i think (talk) 11:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

"These extremist ideas that state innocent civilians can be legitimate targets for attack have no support among scholarly circles, and never did." - ISB/YM Publication on Terrorism. This details the Islamic perspective on terrorism which is the organisations point of view. usayd (talk) 15:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Young Muslims UK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140201150427/http://www.ymuk.net/ to http://www.ymuk.net
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ymuk.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&Itemid=113
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080628043059/http://www.mcb.org.uk:80/affiliates.php to http://www.mcb.org.uk/affiliates.php
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140201150427/http://www.ymuk.net/ to http://www.ymuk.net

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)