Talk:TheatreWorks (Silicon Valley)

Latest comment: 12 days ago by GentlemanGhost in topic organization involved PR editing

Notability, Sources

edit

The article seems notable enough as it gets US-wide attention. Too, two sources have been added. The style could be improved, especially the extensive list ist superfluous.--Peter Eisenburger (talk) 10:34, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

organization involved PR editing

edit

This article shows many signs of company involved publicity editing such as disposable purpose specific accounts and adding unsourced contents. By the way, @GentlemanGhost:, you recently edited this article after me, and not long before I did. Did you notice all significant PR edits that have been done to the article in the past?? Graywalls (talk) 18:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ha ha. Bell pepper. :)
And yes, there does appear have been a fair amount of editing by SPAs. --GentlemanGhost (séance) 06:25, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@GentlemanGhost so, why didn't you take any of the trash out all this time rather than continuing to add contents? Graywalls (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I didn't realize that was my sole responsibility. You apparently have more stomach for the fight than I do. --GentlemanGhost (séance) 18:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply