Talk:TheatreWorks (Silicon Valley)
Latest comment: 12 days ago by GentlemanGhost in topic organization involved PR editing
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability, Sources
editThe article seems notable enough as it gets US-wide attention. Too, two sources have been added. The style could be improved, especially the extensive list ist superfluous.--Peter Eisenburger (talk) 10:34, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
organization involved PR editing
editThis article shows many signs of company involved publicity editing such as disposable purpose specific accounts and adding unsourced contents. By the way, @GentlemanGhost:, you recently edited this article after me, and not long before I did. Did you notice all significant PR edits that have been done to the article in the past?? Graywalls (talk) 18:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ha ha. Bell pepper. :)
- And yes, there does appear have been a fair amount of editing by SPAs. --GentlemanGhost (séance) 06:25, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- @GentlemanGhost so, why didn't you take any of the trash out all this time rather than continuing to add contents? Graywalls (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't realize that was my sole responsibility. You apparently have more stomach for the fight than I do. --GentlemanGhost (séance) 18:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- @GentlemanGhost so, why didn't you take any of the trash out all this time rather than continuing to add contents? Graywalls (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2024 (UTC)