Talk:Theje/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Iaof2017 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 21:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

After reviewing a good number of your Eurovision contest articles, here is a song review! --K. Peake 21:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  • Rather than having the ref for the English title in the infobox, you should source it in a relevant area of the body
I've placed that part in the beginning of the Composition and reception section Iaof2017 (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • The release sentence should be swapped with writing/production for the correct order
  • ""Theje" is an" → "The song is an"
  • Pipe ballad to Sentimental ballad
  • The critical reception sentence should come directly before the lyric video
  • "as well as on Ramosaj's" → "as well as Ramosaj's"
  • Wikilink black and white
  • Pipe LED screen to LED display

Background and release

edit
  • "stated that he intends to participate" → "revealed his intention to participate"
  • Remove commas around Radio Televizioni Shqiptar (RTSH)
  • Remove "of "Theje"" after the digital release part, as the term accompanying is already used

Composition and reception

edit
  • "as well as the production" → "as well as the production done"
  • "and delve on a" → "and delves into a"
  • "he forgive and continue" → "he forgave and continued"
  • "received generally positive reviews" → "was met with generally positive reviews" but only critics appear to be sourced, not fans
  • "In a review of ESCUnited" → "In a review for ESCUnited"
  • "writer William found it building in" → "writer William saw as building in"
  • "two following "epic" chorus'" → "two following "epic" choruses"

Festival i Këngës

edit
  • Remove introduction to RTSH because you have already done this previously
  • "Although during his shows, Ramosaj's performance commences" → "During his shows, Ramosaj's performance commenced"
  • Wikilink black and white
  • "and eventually progresses" → "and eventually progressed" but where does the source actually mention this part?
I removed that part and merged it with the following portion [1]. Iaof2017 (talk) 12:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Dark imagery is not sourced
  • Pipe LED walls to LED display
  • "regarded by media" → "regarded by the media"
  • [18][19][20][21][22] is too many citations at the end of one sentence, so move them around to relevant parts (preferably after punctuation)

Personnel

edit
  • Good

Track listing

edit
  • Good

Release history

edit
  • Format → Format(s)

References

edit
  • Copyvio score looks superb at 4.8%!!!
  • Cite ESCplus as publisher instead on ref 4
  • WP:OVERLINK of Apple Music on the second citation of ref 5
  • Cite YouTube in the via parameter instead on ref 6
  • WP:OVERLINK of Radio Televizioni Shqiptar on ref 13
  • Cite Eurovoix as publisher instead on ref 14
  • Cite Panorama as work/website instead on ref 18

Final comments and verdict

edit
Hi @Kyle Peake: hope you're good. I've solved your comments above with two notes by me. Greetings to you! Iaof2017 (talk) 12:36, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Kyle Peake for the review. :D Iaof2017 (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply