Talk:Themes in Avatar/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Pyrotec in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Will review, starting tomorrow. Pyrotec (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Initial comments

edit
  • I've have a quick couple of skim-read throughs. At this stage the article appears to be comprehensive and well referenced. As such, I would expect it to make GA-status this time round. However, this is not the final decision; and I'm now starting a detailed review.
  • It's worth noting that at this point in the review I will mostly listing "problems", so this part is possibly somewhat negative, but by the end of the review all points will have been covered. Pyrotec (talk) 09:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Looks well on its way to becoming FA to me... Dr. Blofeld White cat 11:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Overall summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A good GA: well-referenced, well-illustrated and comprehensive.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    Well referenced.
    C. No original research:  
    Well referenced.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

A very readable article at or beyond GA-level. I'm therefore awarding GA-status. Congratulations on producing a fine article. P.S. I must get the DVD from Amazon.

I tend to agree with Dr. Blofeld, its well on its way to being an WP:FAC. FAC is tough, but I do suggest that you submit it when you're are ready to WP:PR. Pyrotec (talk) 14:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply