Talk:Theodor-Fliedner-Gymnasium
Latest comment: 7 days ago by 2A02:C7C:EC31:4200:5935:4048:17E1:63F9 in topic possible junk article
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
possible junk article
edit@Flounder fillet:, it would take a lot of time to go through all the sources. This article was created this year, yet some sources are showing retrieval date of 2019. Do you think this might be better off AfD'd under WP:TNT? It might be just quicker to re-build from scratch than to try to scrutinize every source and verify. Graywalls (talk) 03:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wrong retrieval dates are evidence that the cite templates were generated by AI, and thus content was almost certainly inserted with no regard for whether sources support it. Blow it up. Flounder fillet (talk) 03:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The article appears to be a translation from another language version, consistent with Wikipedia’s guidelines on cross-language contributions. The retrieval dates correspond to the original language sources, which is standard practice in translations. The content is factual, well-sourced, and enhances coverage on this topic. 2A02:C7C:EC31:4200:5935:4048:17E1:63F9 (talk) 10:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)