Talk:Theories of poverty

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Mikewinters10 in topic Delete

Photo of orphans

edit

Maybe you should put the photo of orphans in the poverty article (see Barriers to opportunities) after this comment in this article: "When it comes to poverty in the United States, there are two main lines of thought. The most common line of thought within the U.S. is that a person is poor because of personal traits." Stars4change (talk) 02:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ferdinand Lundberg said in "The Rich and the Super-Rich" "Nobody, first of all, would be rich if he had not been favored by circumstances. Favoring general circumstances in the United States have been: a naturally rich virgin continent, an enlarging widely skilled population, a basic law designed to facilitate private property under earlier purely agrarian-mercantile circumstances, an expanding technology that took multiplied advantages of agrarian-mercantile law and a plethora of PURCHASABLE officials!..." He lists more but the first sentence should be all that's needed. Stars4change (talk) 02:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

>> Pakistan's Thar residents living on the edge (Lihaas (talk) 17:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)).Reply

Delete

edit

This page presents un-scientific theories on the causes of poverty. Some of these theories are racist and classist, such as that poverty is a personal failing. Further, consider that most of the citations point to an article or book published over 20 years ago.

Wikipedia already has a page on the causes of poverty, which is up to date and based upon scientific data. We should delete this page because there's already a better page, and frankly, the so-called theories are unscientific and classist. Mikewinters10 (talk) 13:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply