Talk:Theosophical mysticism
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Theosophy (Boehmian) was copied or moved into Theosophical mysticism with this edit on 2015-01-16. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Proposed merge
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- To not merge, given that the articles have different scope and that readers benefit from having these separately discussed. Klbrain (talk) 11:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Overlapping discussion in "Theosophy (Blavatskian)" and Theosophical mysticism. No reason to separate the 2 topics. Merge, Not only because of that per se, but also because doing so results in no Wp:Weight issues. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 02:46, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. Theosophical mysticism covers specific theosophic beliefs in detail; Theosophy covers the religion as a whole. Much like Catholic theology and Catholicism both exist as articles,I think it's reasonable that Theosophic belief and Theosophy as a whole are separated.
- Additionally, I'm unsure of what WP:Weight issues would arise.
- TypistMonkey (talk) 03:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with the logic and reason present in the opposition. Both subjects are different. Theosophy covers the history, etymology and some beliefs while mysticism covers specific theosophical principles in detail. 60.243.16.37 (talk) 08:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. There is scope for two articles, even if, at present, there are certain elements in the Theosophical mysticism article which belong more properly in the main Theosophy article (especially the text in "Helena Blavatsky's skeptics".) Midnightblueowl (talk) 09:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.