 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. Edits made by the below user(s) were last checked for neutrality on 3 January 2024 by Darcyisverycute.
|
Draftify?
editI considered a cleanup, but there is just too much vaguely or directly promotional language woven into the prose. Some of it would belong in a scientific paper to sell the importance of the topic, but it is not appropriate for encyclopedic purposes. Suggestion: draftify pending cleanup? Draken Bowser (talk) 22:39, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- It looks like there were a few improvements removing the marketing language since you've posted, so I have marked it as reviewed after cleaning up the lead. I have strongly encouraged the author to use edit requests as they are a paid editor, please make sure promotional material is not inserted back into the article. Darcyisverycute (talk) 06:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- I suggest to clean the page, the topic theranostics have importance in the current scientific and medicinal scenario but the article is misguiding the basic concepts. Rahulsoman (talk) 04:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)