Talk:There's Got to Be a Morning After Pill

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Miyagawa in topic GA Review
Good articleThere's Got to Be a Morning After Pill has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThere's Got to Be a Morning After Pill is part of the Veronica Mars (season 3) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 3, 2016Good article nomineeListed
June 28, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 31, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Rob Thomas had envisioned the main plot for "There's Got to Be a Morning After Pill", an episode of Veronica Mars, since before the beginning of the third season?
Current status: Good article


GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:There's Got to Be a Morning After Pill/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 14:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


Ok, running through a review now. I've run the dash tool and fixed one duplicate link.

  • Image licence is good.
  • Lead: I like the inclusion of the series summary in the first paragraph rather than the second as it helps balance the size of the three. I might have to borrow that idea for my Star Trek articles.
Yeah, it was indirectly suggested by a reviewer who thought that I should make my first paragraphs longer.
  • Production: You repeat "marking" in the same context twice in successive sentences. Can you re-write one to stop it coming off as repetitive?
  • Reviews: "great" needs a direct citation.
  • "Like last week's episode, 'There's Got to Be a Morning After Pill' benefited from integrating already established characters into a mystery of the week." needs a direct citation.
  • "jam-packed with drama" needs a direct citation.
  • "one of the weakest that the show has ever done." needs a direct citation.
  • Television Without Pity is in italics in the cite, but not in the body of the article.

Once those issues are corrected, I think this article will be good to go for GA. Miyagawa (talk) 14:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Miyagawa: I believe that I have responded to all comments and concerns. I don't know if you have any GANs, but if you do, I would be happy to review one (or more). If you could respond on my FL, that would be great as well. Johanna(talk to me!) 22:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Great, happy to promote. Miyagawa (talk) 22:12, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply