This article was nominated for deletion on 26 December 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I wonder how making a statement of fact about an academic, and stating that he works for a particular univesity is completely useless and cannot be added to.... why eliminate a correct statement that can be built upon? and a statement which qualifies what the person describes has stated elsewhere??
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have to say that the book Botstrapping is barely readable. I am a avid researcher of Engelbart, intelligence augmentation, history of IT, but the book is just endless ramblings of a sociologist. In an academic seminar that would be acceptable. In book for it’s just low quality. Paranoid (talk) 15:41, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
