Talk:Thierry Mugler

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Xoak in topic the infobox pic

Untitled

edit

Thierry Mugler is a person first, then a company. Chris 00:14, 21 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

What's this entry about?

edit

Is it about Thierry Mugler, the designer, Mugler the brand, or Clarins cosemtics? --Navstar 07:55, 24 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

It is about Mugler, the designer.

I've tried to realign the article to concentrate on Thierry Mugler the person. The artifacts produced by him or under his name have a place, but the emphasis needs to be an encylcopaedic commentary on the man himself. (that's the way I tackled it, anyhow) - Hebrides 14:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to know the correct pronunciation of his name, is it MUG-ler or Mul-yar or Mul-har or what? I assume Thierry is pronounced like Terry, is that correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danu6403 (talkcontribs) 02:08, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bodybuilding

edit

Thierry has taken up bodybuilding, here's a pic of his accomplishments which I think we should include on this article, WARNING: NSFW: [1] 75.68.6.81 10:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rubbish

edit

This article is the worst ever. It needs an introduction, and then completely rewriting.86.152.174.176 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:59, 16 August 2010 (UTC). --86.152.174.176Reply

Agreed. The whole section about his childhood is not only completely uncited and unobjective (aka "he was a dreamy child"), but by looking at the IP address of the editor who wrote that section, it was written by someone at his own company, Clarins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.161.204.6 (talk) 14:46, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

?

edit

This article has nothing encyclopedic in it! could be deleted in dead-time...! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Φοίνιξ (talkcontribs) 03:12, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Delete, delete, delete

edit

I second all the frustration spelled out above and motion someone with credibility and authority to delete as fast as you can say Mewluhr! 203.131.247.211 (talk) 08:12, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

The picture looks blurry. Luhh. Kimberly (talk) 20:11, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Revision

edit

Hello, I wikified it some and removed the npov statements. Reorganized everything as it was written by someone who is not npov or probably a wikipedian. I also added some images. It still needs to be rewritten and more neutrality but it's a lot better. --Turn685 (talk) 22:19, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nicola Formichetti

edit

I have created Nicola Formichetti but happen to know nothing about fashion. Tonight and tomorrow I will contribute some content using what sources I have and understand, but it is up to you fashion people to really grow his article. DinDraithou (talk) 02:24, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thierry Mugler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thierry Mugler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your Angel larose

edit

I absolutely love that scent Angel Larose any chance of it ever coming back? Is there anywhere I can still buy it? Sincerely Sandra Barela 2600:6C51:637F:31FD:7D08:1751:1565:4963 (talk) 07:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Suggesting 2 new pages: MUGLER fashion + MUGLER fragrance

edit

This is heavily focused on the designer himself. His fashion line should certainly be its own page. And the fragrance line has a lot of notable points, including their history with L’Oréal group, plus some of their fragrances already have their own individual pages (how does that happen before an overarching brand page is created I will never understand). I’m putting this in my nice-to-have pile for one day. Agree/disagree? Any input appreciated. Informationageuser (talk) 13:17, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

the infobox pic

edit

sighs X (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply