Talk:Thieves and Kings

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Canadian comics work group.

Notability

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I believe this series does have sufficient notability to warrant its own article. I have therefore removed the PD template. I also added a link to a critical review to help substantiate this assertion.

IMO, "Thieves & Kings" has just as much, if not more, notability as random hamlets with populations in the 1000 range - a subject which Wikipedia is substantially supplied with. Comments? DeMatt (talk) 08:12, 2 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

What's the proof of sufficient notability? I see you asserting that it warrants it, but I don't know how that proves anything. Has this won awards? Influenced other books? Been reviewed more than once? I'd like to see a little more justification than one review. --Kynn (talk) 02:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Contested prods should never be restored for any reason. Besides, the Curled Up source satisfies WP:N. --Explodicle (T/C) 14:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic