Talk:Third-party grading

Numismatics High‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV dispute - Impact

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The text beginning with "Third Party Grading was created for the sole purpose..." (third paragraph) appears to be written with a strong POV biased against Third Party Grading services. Text like "scourge", "laughs all the way to the bank", and "purposely misgraded" imply ill intent on the part of the Third Party Grading services. These paragraphs need to be rewritten from a neutral point of view, neither biased against nor in favor of the grading services which are allegedly doing these acts. Additionally, these claims need to be backed up with verifiable citations from a trusted and accepted source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.168.59 (talk) 06:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done.--R&BpopROCK (talk) 00:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Small edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Under the "Impact" heading, there was a misspelling. It read "vertain," which I assumed to mean "certain." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.40.186 (talk) 05:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic