Talk:Third battle of Khan Yunis
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
Palestinian victory
editIsn’t the Israeli army withdrawing and Hamas and allies remaining combat effective the definition of a victory in guerrilla warfare? If the article on the Vietnam War can openly say “North Vietnamese Victory” I have no clue as to why the same can’t be said here. Ilovethedajjal (talk) 06:07, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- The article should err on the side of Israeli victory, as other articles on this site rely on ISW for post battle assessments. In this instance, ISW, as a reliable source, claims Hamas to be combat ineffective in Khan Younis. https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/israel-defeating-hamas-destroying-hamas-will-require-post-war-vision Elektriknik (talk) 18:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)