Talk:Thom Yorke

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Popcornfud in topic Pro-Palestine Heckler
Former good article nomineeThom Yorke was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 29, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Climate change

edit

Hi Popcornfud, can you please explain why Thom’s support for Extinction Rebellion has nothing to do with climate change in your eyes? This is the edit in question: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1057014305 I have the impression that Thom is very concerned about the climate catastrophe and for that reason selected the movement as beneficiary. Thanks, —Daveboy123 (talk) 21:52, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi. That section should focus specifically on climate change topics that are specifically related to Thom Yorke. The bulk of the information I removed there is about the hack and subsequent Bandcamp release of the MiniDiscs album; the Extinction Rebellion thing is secondary. That section already has a lot of information about Yorke and climate change, and that story doesn't seem like a particularly notable example. Popcornfud (talk) 22:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2022

edit

Adding this quote in green at the end of this sentence: Seeing Siouxsie Sioux in concert at the Apollo in 1985 inspired him to become a performer: "I'd never seen anyone manage to captivate an audience like she did... It was an amazing show" basing on these two sources[1], seems to highly annoy a super fan Popcornfud who has put their stamp on this article. Primary sources are perfectly acceptable and reliable to submit a quote in a biography when a footnote with the entire quote is included in the source. Iennes (talk) 22:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

It seems like you're the "highly annoyed" one here, no?
First, that isn't actually a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE, or a secondary source. It's a fan-uploaded recording of a copyrighted interview, uploaded to YouTube.
Secondly, and this is the bigger thing, I'm not sure what you see as particularly valuable about that quote; it seems to me the meat the statement here can be paraphrased sufficiently, per MOS:QUOTE. Presumably Yorke thought it was an "amazing show" or he wouldn't have found it inspiring. Popcornfud (talk) 22:56, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
BBC's official link is on. And even without an official audio link, one can include a primary source when including a footnote in the source with the actual quote of the artist, plus the timing when the quote is said. Iennes (talk) 23:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Everitt, Matt (11 June 2017). "BBC Radio 6 Music, The First Time With Thom (broadcast on 11 June 2017)". YouTube. Retrieved 2 February 2021. Q: Do you remember thinking I could see myself.. [Thom:]I didn't really think that until I saw Siouxsie and the Banshees at the Apollo [...] That one completely blew my mind [...]I'd never seen anyone manage to captivate an audience like she did. [...] They were amazing to watch. [...] It was an amazing show.

Pro-Palestine Heckler

edit

I have removed the edit: "At a show in Melbourne, Yorke responded angrily to pro-Palestine heckler and left the stage before returning for the encore." "Angrily" could be libellous. I am also unconvinced that this sentence reaches the criteria of WP:N Thudinspecies (talk) 09:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think based on the account given in the source, anyone would agree that "angry" is a reasonable summary of Yorke's behavior, though I wouldn't object to just writing "he walked off stage" instead.
As for notability, this has been covered in major news publications such as the Guardian, Times, BBC, the Indepedent ... Popcornfud (talk) 10:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply