 | A fact from Thomas-Morse R-5 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 January 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TM-22
editU.S.Military Aircraft Designations and Serials since 1909 gives the type as an MB-22? MilborneOne (talk) 20:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Both Wegg and Angelucci and Bowers give the type as TM-22 - there seems to have been a step change from the MB-10 to the TM-23. Subsequent aircraft were the TM-23 single-seat fighter and TM-24 two-seat fighter/observation aircraft.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- OK no problem although I did find some good images at [1] the text has been copied from aerofiles which appears to be wrong. MilborneOne (talk) 21:58, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Talking of good photos, there are 11 great photos [here on the San Diego Air & Space Museum's flickerstream - all sadly with unusable licenses.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- OK no problem although I did find some good images at [1] the text has been copied from aerofiles which appears to be wrong. MilborneOne (talk) 21:58, 20 January 2011 (UTC)