Talk:Thomas Hancock (merchant)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kavyansh.Singh in topic GA Review
Thomas Hancock (merchant) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 8, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Thomas Hancock (merchant)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 08:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Nominator: Dabberoni15 (talk · contribs) at 20:39, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
GA criteria
editGA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Comments
editThe son of an Anglican preacher, Hancock rose
— Might be confusion as-to which Hancock we are referring to: John or Thomas- Initially, I wanted to use only the surname Hancock to refer to the article subject, Thomas. However, since his notability is heavily predicated on his more famous nephew with the same surname, I'm not really sure how to resolve this issue. Would you be kind enough to suggest any solutions?
- I'll suggest to write his full name again. Would be repetitive, but would be clearer. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Done
- Initially, I wanted to use only the surname Hancock to refer to the article subject, Thomas. However, since his notability is heavily predicated on his more famous nephew with the same surname, I'm not really sure how to resolve this issue. Would you be kind enough to suggest any solutions?
age of fourteen.
— suggesting to write '14' in numerals, per MOS:SPELL09- Done
- I don't think we need to link "fish"
- Done
on the Governor's Council
— "in the Governor's Council"? (both in lead and the prose)- Done
for fifty-five years
— 55 in numerals- Done
Hancock's mother was Elizabeth Clark, who died
— suggesting: "Hancock's mother, Elizabeth Clark, died"- Done
was fourteen years old
,seventeen sloops
,thirty-four years after
— MOS:SPELL09- Done
his own bookstore
— linking bookstore appears over linking, pretty much everyday word.- Done
"a general trade that soon involved the entire British empire."
— the prose does not makes it clear where this quote comes from.- It's from Pencak (2004). Do you want for me to state where the quote comes from?
- Yes, something like "According to author/historian William Pencak, "a general ..." – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Done
- Yes, something like "According to author/historian William Pencak, "a general ..." – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- It's from Pencak (2004). Do you want for me to state where the quote comes from?
the West Indies, Spain and Portugal, building ships, and importing books and luxury goods from Europe
— Oxford comma after 'Spain', and semi colon after 'Purtugal'- Done
where they had 21,000 pounds combined
— exactly or approximately?- According to Pencak (2004), the pair had 21,000 Massaschusetts pounds combined, which was approximately 15,000 pound sterling. How do you recommend I address this?
- I'd very much argue that is is approximate value, but as the source does not state it, leave it as it is in the text. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Done
- I'd very much argue that is is approximate value, but as the source does not state it, leave it as it is in the text. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- According to Pencak (2004), the pair had 21,000 Massaschusetts pounds combined, which was approximately 15,000 pound sterling. How do you recommend I address this?
- Various p./pp. inconsistencies. Single page takes 'p.', page ranges take 'pp.' Following all should be 'p.'
- "Hooper 1904, pp. 62"
- "Barratt 1995, pp. 221."
- "Roberts 2015, pp. 382."
- "Wroth 1938, pp. 137"
- "Unger 2000, pp. 16."
- "Fowler 1980, pp. 31."
- "Middlekauff 2007, pp. 66."
- "Bacon 2015, pp. 38."
- Done
- File:Thomas Hancock by John Singleton Copley.jpg — when was this first published, not created?
- I'm sorry to say that I am not familiar with this line of questioning. I was under the impression that since it was produced over 2 centuries ago, it was not affected by relevant U.S. copyright legislation. Could you clarify your question please?
- I think I fixed it, following the licencing of the next image. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks
- I think I fixed it, following the licencing of the next image. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to say that I am not familiar with this line of questioning. I was under the impression that since it was produced over 2 centuries ago, it was not affected by relevant U.S. copyright legislation. Could you clarify your question please?
- File:John Singleton Copley - Lydia Henchman Hancock - Google Art Project.jpg — licencing looks fine.
- Suggesting to add ALT text.
- I've added Alt text to the portrait of Thomas Hancock. How do I add alt text to the portrait of his wife?
- Using the
|alt=
parameter. I have added short ALT text. You can expand if you wish. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)- I have expanded it a little. Thanks
- Using the
- I've added Alt text to the portrait of Thomas Hancock. How do I add alt text to the portrait of his wife?
– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:39, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for reviewing this article so quickly. I'm sorry to say that unfortunately I am still relatively new to Wikipedia, and so still need time to familiarize myself with all of its elements (so please bear with me if I need any explanation). I'll now start to go over all the points you have raised and address them. Regards, Dabberoni15 (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- No issues at all, let me know if you need any help or explanation for any of the above mentioned point. I'll be happy to help! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:41, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- All the issues are resolved; happy to pass! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)