Talk:Thomas J. Donohue
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thomas J. Donohue article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A news item involving Thomas J. Donohue was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 15 October 2024. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Plagarism
editThis page is plagarized from this link http://www.cipe.org/about/board/bios.php#donohue.SADADS (talk) 19:27, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Sources for additional biographical info
editMembers dropping out during Trump administration
editGE issue and others. Wikipietime (talk) 10:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
CEO spent $600,000 of Chamber funds on May trip: report
edit“U.S. Chamber of Commerce CEO Thomas Donohue, who just announced he is stepping down, has been racking up miles on corporate jets provided by the business trade group for both professional and personal trips, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.“ — Jo3sampl (talk) 21:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Should The BLP Tag Be Removed?
editAccording to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Maintenance_template_removal#When_to_remove, a maintenance template (in this case, a BLP tag calling for "additional citations") may be removed "when an article talkpage discussion has not been initiated." As far as I can tell, no discussion has been initiated. What's more, I do not believe that "additional citations" are in fact needed; the current citations come from sources such as The New York Times, Politico, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, etc. PetesPizza (talk) 11:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
I support removing the template. Plenty of room to improve this article, but no need for the template. There is at least one place where citations are needed, for the impact of the Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform. JArthur1984 (talk) 13:29, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Would you prefer to remove it, or should I do? PetesPizza (talk) 12:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Up to you! But agreed that it's time to remove. Plenty of time for anyone else with a differing opinion to respond. JArthur1984 (talk) 13:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)