 | A fact from Thomas Lüscher appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:24, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that according to Swiss cardiologist Thomas Lüscher, chocolate is good for us, if it is dark and bitter, and white chocolate is "not healthy at all"? Source: " Chocolate is a joy for our CV [cardiovascular] system, if consumed in dark, bitter form ... It is important that chocolate contains little sugar and fat, which are obviously not healthy. In particular, white chocolate is not healthy at all." ([1])
- ALT1: ... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- Reviewed: Paddy Fox
Created by Edwardx (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 22:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC).
Hook is interesting and within prescribed limits. Article is new enough and long enough. Sources check. No close paraphrasing to speak of. QPQ completed. There were two duplicate links (i.e.University of Zurich and University of Basel) in the body of the text, which I went ahead and fixed. Article is good to go. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 00:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
