Talk:Thomas Lee (army captain)

Untitled

More editing to be done soon - please don't do anything in meantime. Thanks.--shtove 13:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Not moved. —Centrx→talk • 04:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Thomas Lee (army captain) → Thomas Lee – To restore this article to its original title, which was taken over by the stub article Thomas Lee (Virginia colonist) without discussion.

Survey

• Oppose move I don't see that this Thomas Lee is overwhelmingly more notable than the member of the great Virginia family. Both are in DNB, and there is also a Restoration politician, whom we should probably put at Sir Thomas Lee, first baronet; and there are three others of variant spellings. The solution is to make Thomas Lee a disambiguation page. Septentrionalis 18:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose move - so long as existing links to the original article title are preserved. At the moment, typing in Thomas Lee gets me nowhere near the original. Disambiguation is the right move, I guess.--Shtove 00:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Discussion

It would have been courteous to discuss the move first; but I think it is the right result. Septentrionalis 18:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

My concern over the move was that existing links to other articles would be diverted, but I see User:Dinosaur puppy tried to cover this. There should have been discussion. Disambiguation is the way to go.--Shtove 00:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Vandalism?

Can someone check whether this is vandalism? Thanks much, delldot talk 09:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)