Talk:Thomas Watson (bishop of Lincoln)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lincolnshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article looks like it's been copied verbatim from somewhere else. Possible copyright infringement?

There is no doubt in my mind that this is copyrighted and taken verbatim: where else do the first four or five letters of an article appear in all capitals? Someone really needs to look into this. Kakashi-sensei 15:25, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I agree, but it'd be hard to prove. Google searching doesn't turn up anything but this article. It could concievably be legit, so I guess it's innocent until proven guilty. Uttaddmb 20:08, 15 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Both the wikipedia article itself and this site imply that this text was originally authored by someone named John T. Wilford connected with the University_of_Lincoln. The IP address of the original post resolves to pc059151.lincoln.ac.uk. Therefore it is plausible that the wikipedia article was created by mr. Wilford himself. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find his email address or contact him. Rb82 13:40, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

I changed the heading and pulled the florid, biased and obfuscating text into something more legible and immediately readable. This article still needs a lot of work, though. It sounds like there's some rallying happening here, and the style seems informal in some places and dated.

Add topic