Talk:Thompson (band)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

The HSP anthem

edit

I don't know if Thompson wrote the text of the anthem of the Croatian Party of Rights,but he clearly didn't compose it as the melody is the same as that of the song Puška puca (The gun shoots),which I think was the anthem of the Ustaša.The Great Duck (talk) 18:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Rock Za Hrvatsku

edit

This album is often referred to as a "war album" in this article... but it was quite the opposite. This was about trying to find peace, and the songs were anti-war (in the case of Cavoglave... in defense.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.208.58.24 (talk) 02:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Thompson (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Thompson (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:51, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Perković's response to accusations

edit

This section has inappropriate, unsourced editorial conclusions. This entire sentence should be removed:

″However, based on his tumultuous history, which includes many incendiary and hateful remarks towards Serbs and other ethnic groups, coupled with his seeming support for Ustaše movements, this retort was widely believed to be nothing more than politically correct posturing.″

The many allegations packed into that sentence are not sourced to anyone, but rather appear to be inappropriate unsourced editorial conclusions. The only citation for that sentence is a 23 December 2007 Perković interview in The New Generation (currently footnote 16). That interview offers no support for the sentence in question. The claim of a "wide belief" that Perković statement was "politically correct posturing" appears to be a fiction someone invented for Wikipedia, completely unsupported by the cited source. Who conducted the research to ascertain this "wide belief"? Where was this "wide belief" reported?

Moreover, in the interview, Perković explicitly and thoroughly rejects the editorial conclusions of this sentence. The interview is therefore being inappropriately cited for an editorial conclusion that is directly opposite to the content of the interview.

The title of this section is "Perković's response to accusations". This section should therefore accurately report his real responses with properly sourced citations. Instead, it introduces unsourced editorial conclusions about his responses.