Talk:Thoughts and prayers
Latest comment: 28 days ago by 2600:8800:1220:600:70A6:E61B:9E6F:CEA3 in topic Ridiculously liberal bias
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thoughts and prayers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Sources
edit- https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mark-kelly-gabby-giffords-on-gun-violence-thoughts-and-prayers-are-not-enough/
- http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a12763521/las-vegas-shooting-thoughts-and-prayers/
- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/las-vegas-mass-shooting-thoughts-and-prayers_us_59d22650e4b06791bb11c613
- http://variety.com/2017/politics/news/gun-control-congress-las-vegas-shooting-1202577691/
- http://variety.com/2017/politics/news/las-vegas-shooting-gabby-giffords-mark-kelly-gun-laws-1202577979/
- http://ftw.usatoday.com/2017/10/sports-world-reacts-to-las-vegas-shooting-thoughts-and-prayers
---Another Believer (Talk) 19:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Good article....🤡 47.219.81.65 (talk) 13:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Ridiculously liberal bias
editAs usual, it’s hard to take Wikipedia seriously when an entire article about a phrase used by millions across the political spectrum is almost completely a dig at Trump and conservatives. Most people I know who use this empty phrase are liberals. Alexandermoir (talk) 21:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, this article is hilarious for this reason. I don't want it deleted, and I don't want anyone "fixing" this. It should remain up and show how ridiculous wikipedia is with their bias. 47.219.81.65 (talk) 13:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Both of could perhaps help improve the article by adding properly sourced examples of the use of the expression by people from what you call the "liberal" side of politics. HiLo48 (talk) 23:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- "Properly sourced" when most of non-liberal sources are on "not proper sources" list... 185.216.51.132 (talk) 12:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Both of could perhaps help improve the article by adding properly sourced examples of the use of the expression by people from what you call the "liberal" side of politics. HiLo48 (talk) 23:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Alexandermoir I took it upon myself to edit the article into a more neutral stance, reducing the bias substantially. There's probably some merit in the existence of the article, but it's true that sources showing its use by non-conservatives would be appropriate per Wikipedia's neutrality policy.
- I added one where President Obama used the phrase in response to a shooting at Fort Hood, but I have no doubt there are many others. The recent assassination attempt on President Trump would likely yield many uses from non-conservatives if someone wants to add to it. 2600:8800:1220:600:70A6:E61B:9E6F:CEA3 (talk) 22:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)