Talk:Thoughts on the Education of Daughters

Thoughts on the Education of Daughters is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 7, 2008.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 31, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
August 20, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
September 9, 2007	Featured article candidate	Promoted
October 30, 2007	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
March 5, 2022	Featured article review	Demoted
August 23, 2022	Featured topic removal candidate	Demoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 23, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the title of Mary Wollstonecraft's conduct book Thoughts on the Education of Daughters alludes to John Locke's Some Thoughts Concerning Education, one of its primary philosophical influences?
Current status: Former featured article

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 - August 2007 - September 2007, covering GA review and FAC comments
Archive 2 – February 2008, regarding POV

Online version

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Does anyone know of a free, online version of TED? Awadewit | talk 08:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm only three years late, but here you are: [1] NW (Talk) 03:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Excellent - thanks! Awadewit (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

FA sweeps

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The article has a bit of unsourced content and cleanup tags. Another concern is comprehensiveness. The article is short and more info could be added from sources like these[2][3][4] (t · c) buidhe 04:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Buidhe, for the first link, this journal does not strike me as reliable for encyclopedic purposes—what do you think? czar 03:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

You might be right about that. (t · c) buidhe 03:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

WP:URFA/2020

I added attribution, cn and or tags in March, 2021, that have not been addressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic