Talk:Three Tuns, Alcester
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Bruxton in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from Three Tuns, Alcester appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 January 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 16:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the 17th-century Three Tuns pub in Alcester, Warwickshire, has been left roofless since a 2021 fire? Source: "the burnt-out shell was left open to the elements" from: Evans, Lise (17 August 2022). "Work starting on Alcester's fire-damaged pub". Stratford Herald. Retrieved 19 January 2023. and "She told the Herald: “Without a tin hat on the roof of the pub it has no protection from rain or winter weather. It’s too late to erect a temporary roof now because the damp inside would sweat and cause dry rot." from: Woodings, Simon (18 January 2022). "Future of Alcester pub destroyed by fire put under spotlight". Stratford Herald. Retrieved 19 January 2023. I don't have the Private Eye to hand but it stated (in December 2022) that it was still without a roof
Created by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 14:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: - 2nd paragraph unsourced.
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: @Dumelow: Good article. But shouldn't the Second paragraph have citations? Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC) Thanks Onegreatjoke, I must have forgotten the reference! Now added - Dumelow (talk) 09:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Looks good now. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)